Permalink
Wednesday, April 27th 2011

Statement No. 08-11

26th April 2011

Statement No. 8/2011 

In the wake of the judgment rendered by the ad hoc Tribunal in The Hague relating to the legal matter of Gotovina et al., Croatia has once again been confronted with a different view of the events that took place after the military-police operation Storm. This view is, of course, different from what we would like it to be.

 

Without questioning the legitimacy of the military-police operation “Storm,” and without placing in doubt the legal foundation and impartiality of the judgment itself, being the only NGO dealing with human rights to have participated right from the start in the systematic observation of the events that took place on the liberated territory of the Republic of Croatia in 1995, we feel it is our duty to express our point of view not only on the said events but also the things that happened after the military-police operations “Flash” and ‘’Storm.” We do this because the liberated territories have become the locus of massive human rights violations that legal experts have qualified as war crimes.

Since the Committee was well informed about murders, arson, and other crimes, it notified by word of mouth and in writing all the competent institutions of the state, from the President of the Republic to the police and the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Croatia (DORH). Similarly, we provided information about our findings in the field to all religious and international institutions, as well as the media. All our statements and press releases were published in Rijeka’s Novi list, and collected in the book “The CHC Statements 1993-2003.” Moreover, in 2001 the Committee released a collective report on the military-police operations “Storm” and “Flash”.

 

The judgment of the ad hoc Tribunal in the legal matter of Gotovina et al. has caused a heated debate throughout Croatia, but there is practically no word about the victims of the military-police operations. The prime minister has ordered a “diplomatic offensive” so as to use the help of “our friends” in other countries in order to exert pressure on the Tribunal to change its decision. We feel that this is an unprecedented violation of the rule of law, and at the same time, an attack on the constitutional system and separation of powers. The prime minister has also instructed that an investigation be conducted so as to determine who submitted the transcripts to the Tribunal, even though they were delivered in accordance with the Constitutional law on the cooperation with the Hague tribunal. There is no need to say that such a high-ranking government official should have ordered a detailed investigation into the real number of victims who had been killed in the operation “Storm,” by simply putting into practice the old biblical tenet “only the truth can save us”.

 

In relation to its activities during the period after the operation “Storm,” the Croatian Helsinki Committee (CHC) used as its motto the famous quote from Pope John Paul II concerning the war in ex-Yugoslavia: “This time no one will be able to say – we didn’t know!” The CHC wants to inform the public of the data that we have at our disposal. We wish to do that since the Croatian Television (HRT) released the data from the DORH regarding the number of Serb victims in the aftermath of the operation “Storm.” These details were aired in the Easter edition of HRT’s main evening news program on 24 April 2011. We feel that the data disclosed on that day is part of a “diplomatic offensive” on the part of all tiers of Croatian authorities. At the same time, the said data prove that not much has changed in Croatia in the last 15 years with respect to the war crimes and the rule of law.  

1. Since the outbreak of the Croatian Homeland War a total of 3,655 judicial investigations have been initiated against persons suspected of war crimes. This number refers to the period up to 31 December 2010. Of the total, 95 members of the Croatian army and police have been charged with crimes. As for the crimes committed over the last 20 years, only 28 members of the Croatian Army and police have been indicted. The other indicted persons are Serbs (a tabular outline classified as per DORH is provided in the attachment). 563 persons were sentenced. According to our data, not a single member of the Croatian Army or police, nor any other person for that matter, has been indicted for war crimes committed against Serb soldiers and civilians after the operation “Storm.”

2. In the TV news broadcast on the HRT the DORH disclosed information that is not true.Upon completion of the military-police action “Flash” in May 1995, the minister of defense, Gojko Šušak, declared before the deputies of the Croatian parliament that 450 enemy soldiers had been killed in that operation. When the CHC activists decided to run a check on these allegations, it was determined that not a single hospital in the vicinity of the liberated Croatian territory had admitted wounded soldiers. Similarly, there were no prisoners of war. In the ensuing months the special police forces were constantly “cleaning the area” and eliminating the last pockets of resistance of the “insurgents.” We never had a chance to find out what happened to the people that the special police forces had clashed with.

      

3. Right after the completion of the military-police operation “Storm,” the office of the then Croatian president Franjo Tuđman used Ivica Kostović as a spokesperson to inform the public that 950 enemy soldiers had been killed during the operation. Once again, not a single wounded soldier had been admitted to any of the hospitals in the vicinity of the liberated territory. Similarly, there were no prisoners of war. At no point was there an official statement as to how many people had been eliminated during the ensuing mop-up operations. At the time of the crimes committed in the village of Grubori, when 11 elderly people were killed (some people claim that only 8 persons were killed there, which is incorrect - the list of their names is available in the CHC book) – the special police simultaneously did away with around 40 “insurgents.” (The CHC statement No. 29 of 2 November 1995).

           

4. We don’t know how it is possible for the DORH to conclude that “24 war crimes had been committed which claimed the lives of 156 people,” when no one was indicted for commission of war crimes after the operation Storm. It would only be possible for the DORH to do so by citing this information from the court file Gotovina et al., although that sentence has not become legally valid as yet. The DORH officials claim that “only 10 people” have been charged with war crimes, probably referring to the Varivode case, in which all the defendants were acquitted on account of insufficient evidence. As for the massacre in Varivode, we can state that it occurred at around 5:30 p. m. on Thursday, 28 September 1995, almost two months after the completion of the operation “Storm.” Nine people were killed in that village, most of whom were infirm elderly people. In this case, the investigating judge of the County Court of Zadar, Mr Klišmanić, the prosecutor from Zadar, and six police officers from the Zadar Police Department led by Mr Adem Mehmedović visited the crime scene. (The CHC statement No. 26 of 2 October 1995). Up to that point, the police had only engaged in “human assanation” since the competent authorities never allowed a crime scene investigation to be conducted, as in the village of Grubori. In this case, the investigating officials Ivica Vrtičević and Jozo Bilobrk denied an alleged request from Željko Sačić to conduct a bogus “crime scene investigation,” which would have required them to plant weapons next to the killed elderly people so as to present them for armed insurgents. This is why criminal charges were brought against Željko Sačić last year suggesting that he was guilty of a criminal offence against humanity and international law, and a war crime against the civilian population pursuant to Article 120 paragraph 1 of the General Criminal Code of the Republic of Croatia (OKZRH) in relation to Article 28 paragraph 2 of the said law. In our opinion, this fact is the main propellant for Sačić’s extremist political activity today.

    

5. In its declaration, the DORH stated that the difference in the data disclosed by the CHC (677 people killed), and that disclosed by the DORH, revolves around the fact that the CHC “does not separate war victims from victims of war crimes and murders.” The list of victims included in the CHC report includes exclusively the civilian victims killed after the official completion of the military-police operation “Storm.” Our activists were given strict instructions when they were gathering evidence. The CHC list contains only the names of those people whose identity was attested by at least two witnesses. It does not contain the names of people who participated in the insurgents’ units. Our observers received the information about additional several hundred murdered individuals whose names had not been put on our list as they did not meet the criteria. Our activists determined that 20,000 buildings, houses, and dwellings had been damaged, burnt down or completely destroyed in the liberated territories. This figure includes houses and agricultural facilities, but also buildings of public interest such as railway stations, community clinics, schools, power sub-stations, lamp-posts, etc. All this leads us to conclude that the action entailed a systematic destruction whose purpose was to hamper the return of the civilian population and the restoration of regular everyday life. Arson and destruction continued into the years after the operation “Storm,” which is evident from the statements and documents that we had published at that time.

 

6. We do not know what methods the DORH used when it separated the “victims of war” from the victims of war crimes and murders. In our opinion, all the victims killed after the operation “Storm” had been eliminated as a target group since they were Serb. This means that we are dealing here exclusively with the victims of war crimes. As for the murders that happened after the operation “Storm,” the DORH can process all of them as war crimes. If not, the DORH is implementing a judicial method typical of “legal theoreticians” who think that those responsible for the killings after the end of the Second World War (9 May 1945) cannot be prosecuted for war crimes since the war had already ended. If this “judicial principle” were to be applied, not a single person killed after the operation “Storm” (9 August) could be treated as a victim of war, and, as a result, no one could be charged with war crimes, including generals Gotovina and Markač.  

7. The CHC believes that the above demonstrates how there is no political will in Croatia to process the war crimes that occurred after the completion of the operation “Storm.” The processing of war crimes should be founded on the principles of the rule of law, e.g. international standards set forth in conventions and other legally valid documents. It is necessary to point out that these documents have been incorporated in the Croatian legal norms, and have thus become their integral part.

At the request of the State Attorney General, Mladen Bajić, last Friday we submitted to the DORH 15 copies of our report on the operations “Storm” and “Flash.” Besides, we also offered the DORH our rich archival materials that would do well to be inspected by the representatives of the Ministry of the Interior and the DORH so as to determine what really happened after the operation “Storm,” and initiate legal proceedings which the Croatian government promised to the EU in its action programme. This would dismiss all the speculations suggesting that the DORH and the Croatian courts have not processed individual war crimes committed after the operation “Storm.” Similarly, the legally valid judgments rendered by the Croatian courts would provide relevant evidence that the military-police operation “Storm” had been misused for ethnic cleansing through the joint criminal enterprise. 

For the CHC:                                                                                                                       Ivan Zvonimir Čičak                                                                                                  President 

Attachments:                                                                                                                      1. Transcript of the first Croatian TV programme from 25 April 2011 at 7:30 p.m.                  2. An outline of the official investigation requests, and the persons accused and indicted

    for war crimes as of 31 December 2010


Statement No. 02-11

Zagreb, 21. siječnja 2011. Izjava broj 02-11 Mediji javljaju da je tužiteljstvo Ad hoc tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju u Haagu zatražilo 240 godina zatvora „hercegovačku šestorku“ kao najodgovornijih za sudjelovanje Hrvatske u ratu u BiH kroz tvorevinu nazvanu Herceg-Bosna.... MORE

Statement No. 01-11

January 15, 2011 Statement No. 01-11 During the meeting held on January 14, 2011 the enlarged executive Committee of the CHC examined Mirjana Sanader’s petition in which she complained of human rights violations sustained by the family of the former Croatian prime minister Ivo Sanader. Mrs... MORE

Izjava broj 19-11 u povodu ukidanja Zakona o golf igralištima

Zagreb, 02. studenoga 2011. Izjava broj 19-2011 Hrvatski helsinški odbor za ljudska prava izražava zadovoljstvo odlukom Hrvatskoga sabora da na inicijativu Vlade predsjednice Jadranke Kosor povuče sporni i osporavani Zakon o golf igralištima. Time je Vlada priznala pogrešku svojih... MORE

Izjava broj 17-11 u povodu odluke o puštanju Mirka Norca na uvjetnu slobodu

Zagreb, 29. rujna 2011. Izjava broj 17-11 Masovna kršenja ljudskih prava, koja pravnici mogu podvesti pod kaznena djela ratnih zločina, bila su jedna od temeljnih preokupacija HHO-a od osnutka do danas. Odbor je bio jedina organizacija za ljudska prava u Hrvatskoj koja je poslije... MORE

Izjava broj 16-11 u povodu govora mržnje hrvatskih navijača na utakmici Hrvatska-Izrael

Zagreb, 00. aaaaa 2011. Izjava broj 16-11 Netolerancija iskazana kroz rasizam, ksenofobiju, antisemitizam i vjersku netrpeljivost realizirana je podjednako u ideologiji i praksi fašizma i komunizma, ostavivši za sobom gorka povijesna iskustva u mnogim društvima svijeta,... MORE

Izjava broj 15-11 upozorenje pred nogometnu utakmicu Hrvatska-Izrael

Zagreb, 5. rujna 2011. Izjava broj 15-11 Šport, a posebno nogomet, u posljednje je vrijeme postao poprištem šovinističkih, rasističkih i drugih manifestacija netrpeljivosti i mržnje. Divljanja skinheadsa i međusobni fizički... MORE